Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Luke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1918No. 2947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District- Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loof6ourow, Judge. Por former appeal see 46 Utah, 26,148 Pac. 452. Action'by George B. Hancock against Francis G. Luke and another. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorpman, J.

This was an action brought in the district court of Salt Lake County by the plaintiff for the rescission of a contract entered into between him and the defendants. The cause was before this court on a former appeal involving the sufficiency of the pleadings. Then a judgment had been awarded the plaintiff on his motion for a judgment on the pleadings. A reversal of that judgment was had by a divided court, and the cause was remanded to the trial court, with directions to permit the defendants to amend their answer, and also permit the plaintiff to amend his complaint, if so advised, and then…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Guyer v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Price v. Western Loan & Savings Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Parduhn v. BennettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Quillin v. ColquhounIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API