Legal Opinion

Castelazo v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 17, 1969No. C.D. 3707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

Six protests were consolidated for trial. They involve various types of woodworking machines as herewith shown.

Protest 66/62282 involves one Motor Driven Planer and Moulder, Type NL/T, exported from England and entered on August 2, 1963.

Protest 65/1958/ involves one Motor Driven White Multiple Rip Sawing Machine and Straight Line Edger, Type AU/A, exported from Scotland and entered on February 13, 1963.

Protest 65/19630 involves three Motor Driven Automatic Hydraulic Double Head Template Shapers, Type “WIGO 1075”, exported from West Germany and entered on June 7,1963.

Protest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Supreme Woodworking Machine v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilshire Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Castelazo & Associates Atwood Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Baldt Anchor, Chain & Forge Division of the Boston Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API