Legal Opinion

Castelazo & Associates Atwood Imports, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 2, 1970No. C.D. 4027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosenstein, Judge:

The merchandise involved in the consolidated protests herein consists of various types of woodworking machines, each imported with one or more electric motors. The machines and accompanying motors were appraised as entireties, and assessed for duty at 13% or 12% per centum ad valorem, depending on the date of entry, as “Articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, * * *, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of metal, and not specially provided for,” under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocal to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Lichtenstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  2. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API