Wilshire Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Newman, Judge:
This protest concerns the proper classification of certain fireplace accessories imported from Japan. The merchandise was imported as four piece sets consisting of:
a stand comprised of a base, bracket, and shaft;
a brush;
a poker; and
a shovel.
The components of the fireplace sets were classified and assessed with duty as separate articles in the following manner: the stand *86(base, bracket, and shaft as an entirety) was assessed with duty at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem under item 653.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS); the brush was assessed with duty at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Simon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Vandergrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- W. A. Force & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mobilite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Sol Kahaner & Bro. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Baldt Anchor, Chain & Forge Division of the Boston Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- North America Foreign Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970