Legal Opinion

Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 30, 1959No. CD. 2107PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaweeNGe, Judge:

Plaintiff protests the action of the collector of customs in classifying various items of woodworking machinery within the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 353), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and the assessment of duty thereon at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem.

It is claimed, in the alternative, that said items of merchandise should properly have been classified as machines, finished or unfinished, not specially provided for, in paragraph 372…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Trans-World Shipping Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API