Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 16, 1966No. C.D. 2681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise at bar is referred to in general terms in the protests, enumerated in the schedule attached to and made part of this decision, and was particularized at the time of hearing and in the briefs of the parties as the items described on the invoices, with or without other words of description, as screens, screen plates, screen plate frames, and stock agitators. Said articles were classified by the collector of customs as stock-treating parts for pulp and paper machinery within the provisions of paragraph 356 of the *479Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by tbe Sixth…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API