Legal Opinion

Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 9, 1987No. 22793PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice:

Hilton Head Center (Center) appeals the dismissal of its complaint. The PSC and the circuit court both held the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We affirm.

In 1981, Center and Hilton Head Plantation Utilities (Utility) entered into an agreement for Utility to provide water and sewer service to Center. Center agreed to pay approximately $73,000 in aid-to-construction fees. When Carter failed to timely pay the fees, the parties entered into a deferred payment agreement. Pursuant to this agreement Center executed three promissory notes. Center paid only one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowe v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Wold v. FunderburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Corley v. Centennial Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  4. Rycroft v. TanguaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Lindler v. BakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Pye v. AycockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Chewning v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Hagy v. PruittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API