Legal Opinion

Hagy v. Pruitt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 2000No. 25091PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Petitioner (Misty) and her former husband, Stan Hagy, commenced this action to set aside the 1992 adoption of their daughter by Misty’s father and stepmother, respondents Don and Ann Pruitt. The family court overturned the adoption. The Court of Appeals reversed. Hagy v. Pruitt, 331 S.C. 213, 500 S.E.2d 168 (Ct.App.1998). We affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision as modified herein.

FACTS

Elizabeth was bom on August 25, 1991, two days after Misty turned sixteen. Misty and Stan, the baby’s eighteen-year-old father, were not married but they were living with the Pruitts at the tune…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Godin v. GodinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. First State Savings & Loan v. PhelpsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Larry Von Nichols and Velma Nichols v. Klein Tools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lowe v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Chewning v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. F.E. v. G.F.M.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API