Legal Opinion

Pye v. Aycock

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1997No. 2610PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

James R. Pye, II (Pye), filed this action against Ronald Elton Aycock (Aycock) seeking damages for injuries incurred when Aycock struck Pye in the face with a metal pipe. The trial court granted Pye’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. We affirm. 1

FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Around 2:00 a.m. on April 20, 1991, Aycock, accompanied by Kevin Coogan, arrived home from his job at the Charleston Naval Base. At that time, he discovered numerous people standing in and around his front yard. Although the parties present starkly different versions of the facts, it is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Beall v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Baugus v. WessingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Byerly Ex Rel. Estate of Byerly v. ConnorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Young v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API