Legal Opinion

Lindler v. Baker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1984No. 0042PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The appellants Charles R. Lindler and Charles R. Lindler Enterprises, Inc., operators of the Howard Johnson’s Motor Lodge near Interstate Highway No. 1-26, seek to enjoin the respondent Bush River Utilities, Inc., from refusing Howard Johnson’s sewer service for non-payment of fees. Lindler and Lindler Enterprises also seek a declaratory judgment that they are under no obligation to pay sewer service fees to Bush River.

The complaint alleges a breach of contractual agreements which preclude Howard Johnson’s from being charged a sewer service fee. Bush River’s demurrer to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Clifton v. Darlington Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Martin v. Carolina Water Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Carolina Water Service, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hilton Head Center of South Carolina, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Anchor Points, Inc. v. Shoals Sewer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. RP BYRDCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. EMP. INS. OF WAUSAUCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API