Legal Opinion

Saari v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1976No. Docket 27559PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. P. Hampton, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of their contract of insurance issued by defendant. The circuit court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, stating that plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted (GCR 1963, 117.2[1]).

Plaintiff Reino D. Saari was injured when a bus, owned by the White Pine Transit Company, was involved in an accident. Mr. Saari was a passenger on the bus. An action was commenced against the White Pine Transit Company for Mr. Saari’s injuries, which resulted in a settlement with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bielski v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hopkins v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Werner v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Reliance Insurance Co. v. HaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ziegelmayer v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Rogers v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. DiLuzio v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API