Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1972No. Docket 12343PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was covered by a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by the defendant, which policy included uninsured motorist coverage. While this policy was in effect, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident which occurred in his employer’s parking lot. The accident occurred as the result of the negligence of a fellow employee, who was an uninsured motorist. Plaintiff concedes that he is unable to bring an action directly against the tortfeasor because of the exclusive remedy provisions of the workmen’s compensation act. Plaintiff nevertheless sought to recover from his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. McGeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. StrangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. NORTHWESTERN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sayan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Medders v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cormier v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Maidment Ex Rel. MaidmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API