Legal Opinion

Carter v. Huntington Title & Escrow, LLC

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 2011No. 116, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

This appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City beckons us to consider whether the Maryland Insurance Administration (“MIA”) is invested with primary *609jurisdiction over claims of title insurance overcharging alleged by Appellant, Maurice Carter (“Carter”), against Appellee, Huntington Title & Escrow, LLC (“Huntington”), such that Carter must pursue his claim initially in an administrative, rather than judicial, forum. As one part of the requirements of refinancing his home loan, Carter purchased lender’s coverage title insurance from Huntington, an issuing agent for Stewart…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. Conestoga Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. United Insurance Co. of America v. Maryland Insurance AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Monarch Acad. Balt. Campus, Inc. v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Chicago Title Ins. v. JenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API