Legal Opinion

State v. Rojas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 26, 1987No. 86-1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the state from an order of the trial court dismissing with prejudice the charges against Roberto Rojas and Jose M. Ortega for cocaine trafficking and possession. We reverse. The trial court erred in dismissing the charges because of the state’s failure to produce a witness for deposition.

The state cannot be deemed responsible for its inability to produce a witness where the state learned belatedly of her incarceration in another state and her refusal to testify against the defendants. “There is no showing that the state, either through calculated official ignorance or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Guzman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. MenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CecilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. VixamarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. State v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. State v. AronsonCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API