Legal Opinion

Guzman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 1986No. 86-680PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant Fidel Guzman appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine, and urges two points for reversal. We find no merit in either point and affirm.

First, the defendant claims error in the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss and his motion for a new trial based on the state’s failure to disclose, upon prior order of the trial court, the whereabouts of a confidential informant who, it is urged, was needed for defense use in the instant case. We cannot agree. There is no showing that the state, either through calculated official ignorance or deliberate,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BriderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. State v. SaldarriagaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Aldazabal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Richert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ZamoraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. RojasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. State v. MenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. State v. AronsonCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API