State v. Aronson
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
1DissentEsquiroz, J.
I respectfully dissent. The state is not required to produce prosecution, much less defense, witnesses for deposition or for trial. State v Carda, 495 So.2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); State v Mesa, 395 So.2d 242, 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). See also State v Jackson, 436 So.2d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v Bonamy, 409 So.2d 518, 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); State v Adderly, 411 So.2d 981, 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); State v Roig, 305 So.2d 836, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Nor is the state required to “keep track” of important witnesses so as to be able to produce them for discovery or at trial, and a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. Del GaudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- State v. RoigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. BonamyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- State v. MesaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.