Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 28, 1986No. 85-373PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The state appeals an order dismissing the information against the defendants. We reverse. The state does not have an obligation to produce witnesses for deposition. State v. Valdes, 443 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Roig, 305 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Once the state revealed the name and address of the informant, it fulfilled its obligation. Consequently, there was no discovery violation and the imposition of a sanction against the state, in this case dismissal of the information, was erroneous. Valdes.

Reversed and remanded.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RoigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State v. ValdesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colby v. McNeillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. State v. RojasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. State v. MenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Colby v. McNeillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. State of Florida v. Lewis StoufferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API