Legal Opinion
State v. Haynes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 6, 1990No. 89-2843PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
557 So.2d 913 (1990)
The STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
William HAYNES, Respondent.
No. 89-2843.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.
2Per curiam
Based upon the respondent William Haynes' confession of error with which we entirely agree, the state's petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review excluding a state witness from…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gerstein v. DurantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- State v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. RojasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
4Cited by5 opinions
- Colby v. McNeillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- State v. PopeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. GoldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Colby v. McNeillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992