Legal Opinion

Wilson & Co. v. Freeman

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1959No. 4-59 Civ. 307PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on for hearing on December 16, 1959, at Minneapolis, Minnesota, before John B. Sanborn, United States Circuit Judge, and Edward J. Devitt and Gunnar H. Nordbye, United States District Judges, impaneled as a statutory three-judge court under the provisions of Section 2284, Title 28, United States Code, upon the application of the plaintiff for an interlocutory injunction. Defendants filed motions to dismiss upon the grounds that the Court lacked jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants and the subject matter; that the complaint failed to state a cause of action, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio Inns, Inc. v. NyeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Swift & Company v. WickhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Johnson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Bartlett & Co., Grain v. State Corp. Com'n of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1963
  5. Harvest v. Board of Public InstructionDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API