Legal Opinion

Bartlett & Co., Grain v. State Corp. Com'n of Kansas

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 26, 1963No. Civ. T-3289PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLAR, District Judge.

On April 4, 1963, the plaintiff filed its complaint and in paragraph 9 thereof it is asserted:

“Since injunction against state statutes and state administrative action is sought this case is required to be heard before a three-judge district court. 28 U.S.C. § 2281.”

Because injunctive relief was sought against state statutes and against state administrative action Chief Judge Alfred P. Murrah was immediately notified and thereafter this Court was duly appointed, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2284, to hear the cause.

The matter was heard on July 12,1963, and thereafter…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson, Commissioner of Agriculture & IndustriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Jehovah's Witnesses in State of Wash. v. King County Hosp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1967
  3. Rakes v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
  4. Metcalf v. SwankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  5. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API