City Bank v. Bateman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Harford County Court. Assumpsit by the appellee against the appellants, brought in Baltimore county court, and removed to Harford county court. The declaration contained four counts — for money laid out, expended and paid — had and received — lent and advanced — and on an insitnul computassent.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Harford County Court. Assumpsit by the appellee against the appellants, brought in Baltimore county court, and removed to Harford county court. The declaration contained four counts — for money laid out, expended and paid — had and received — lent and advanced — and on an insitnul computassent. Plea, non assumpsit, and issue. 1. The plaintiff at the trial proved that he was the proprietor of ten kegs and one bag of dollars, containing in all $11,000, which were brought to the banking house of the defendants, without and against the will and consent of the plaintiff. 'He further…
1Opinion of the Court
At this term the opinion of the court was delivered by
Buchanan, Ch. J.
This case comes up on three bills of exceptions, taken at the trial on the part of the appellants. The statement in the first bill oí exceptions is, that the appellee proved he was the proprietor often kegs and one bag of dollars, containing in all $11,000, which were taken to the banking house of the appellants without and against his will and consent; and that he offered to prove by John S. Gif tings, a clerk of the appellants, that Samuel Hollingsworth was the president, and Robert Barry the cashier pro tempore, of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Flach v. Gottschalk Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Burkowske v. Church Hospital Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Downes v. Maryland & Delaware RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- B & K Rentals & Sales Co. v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- de Lizardi v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.