Legal Opinion
Mack v. Mack
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2000No. Nos. 21235, 21248PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Dean Mack commenced proceedings to dissolve his partnership with his brother, Dale Mack. A.J. and Mary Mack, the parents of Dale and Dean, intervened. The trial court granted Dean’s petition for dissolution of the partnership and distributed the partnership assets. Dale appeals raising six issues, including one issue raised by intervenors. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] A.J. and Mary Mack have nine children, seven girls and two boys, Dale and Dean. They raised their family on a 560-acre dairy farm, which dates back to 1944. In 1985, A.J. was the sole owner of the farm. When his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hayes v. Northern Hills General HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Parker v. Western Dakota Insurors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Glanzer v. St. Joseph Indian SchoolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hofeldt v. MehlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Alan Waner, Plaintiff-Cross v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Noble v. Am. Nat'l Prop.United States District Court · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.