Legal Opinion
Landstrom v. Shaver
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
[¶ 1.] This case involves both legal and equitable claims asserted by Jo Landstrom [hereinafter Landstrom], a minority shareholder, 1 in Black-Hills Jewelry Manufactur- mg Company [hereinafter BHJMC], Her suit is against the remaining shareholders in BHJMC, Milt Shaver [hereinafter Shaver], 2 Jack Devereaux [hereinafter Devereaux], and Constance Drew [hereinafter Drew], The case was tried on an equitable claim of shareholder oppression and legal claims of breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, negligent…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Meiselman v. MeiselmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- In Re the Judicial Dissolution of Kemp & Beatley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Simmons v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Hayes v. Northern Hills General HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.