Legal Opinion
State v. Hyland
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 22, 1988No. C1-88-767PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
Appellant Ronald Hyland was found guilty of illegally parking commercial vehicles on a residential street in violation of St. Paul, Minn., Legislative Code § 157.04(13)b. On appeal, Hyland argues that the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague and unreasonable, that a pretrial hearing on his discriminatory enforcement claim should have been held, and that the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Ronald Hyland owns three commercial vehicles. During September and October 1987, Hyland received seven citations for parking these…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Jeffrey Stuart FalkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Richard Ralston CatlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Holt v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. StallmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.