Legal Opinion
State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 1990No. CX-89-1054PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant alleges that his convictions for making terroristic threats must be reversed because the trial court precluded him from raising the defense of selective prosecution, erroneously refused to instruct a jury and erroneously refused ■ to continue the matter. Appellant also alleges that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions and that the trial court erred by imposing consecutive sentences. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
On November 30, 1988, correctional counselor Timothy Parkos conducted a security check of the correctional…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. ButterfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. DickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State of Minnesota v. Gregory Allen OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.