Legal Opinion
State v. Stallman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 1994No. C6-93-2156PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Jason Edward Stallman was convicted after a court trial of violating Ano-ka’s “cruising” ordinance, Anoka, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 20-4.5 (1992). We reverse.
FACTS
On May 6, 1993, at approximately 9:00 p.m., an officer of the Anoka police department selected a “traffic control point” within the city’s “cruising zone” and began monitoring traffic at the intersection of Main Street and Branch in the City of Anoka. About 30 minutes later, the officer for the first time observed a red Mercury driven by appellant drive past this now established traffic control…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- People v. BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BotsfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. CuypersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. MacHholzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. HolidayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. StallmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994