Legal Opinion

In Re Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1960No. Crim 7100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner, Lillian Miller, seeks a writ of habeas corpus following a finding that she was in contempt of an order or orders of the court. The court further found that defendant’s contempt was a continuing one and by commitment “sentenced her to the County Jail until she-purged herself of the contempt.” She was thereupon remanded to the sheriff “to begin serving her sentence forthwith. ’ ’

Petitioner was defendant and cross-complainant in a divorce proceeding instituted by her husband Louis Miller as plaintiff. Two children were born of the marriage, Jana, age 7 and Corby,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Roche v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guardianship of TurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Albrecht v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. California Department of Health Care ServicesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
  4. Cohen v. ChenowthDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. In Re MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API