Legal Opinion

Roche v. Roche

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1944No. S. F. 16977PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Respondent and appellant are husband and wife, and after living together for eleven years, they separated on March 6, 1943. They have one child, a girl, age eight. On April 9, 1943, plaintiff commenced an action against defendant for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, alleging in her complaint that she “is a fit and proper person to have the custody and control” of said child. That allegation was admitted by defendant, but he alleged that the child had been living with his mother for several years, and to remove the child from her present abode would not be beneficial to the child. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Stever v. SteverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Newby v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Guardianship v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re Marriage of SchiffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Griggs v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API