Legal Opinion

In Re Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1960No. Crim 7100Published

1Opinion of the Court

179 Cal.App.2d 12 (1960)

In re LILLIAN MILLER, on Habeas Corpus.

Crim No. 7100.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 18, 1960.

David C. Marcus for Petitioner.

William B. McKesson, District Attorney (Los Angeles), Harry Wood and Ralph F. Bagley, Deputy District Attorneys, for Respondent.

Philip Silverman and Brock, Fleishman & Rykoff for Real Party in Interest.

KINCAID, J. pro tem. [fn. *]

Petitioner, Lillian Miller, seeks a writ of habeas corpus following a finding that she was in contempt of an order or orders of the court. The court further found that defendant's contempt was a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Guardianship of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Roche v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API