Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lagar v. Erickson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1936No. Civ. 1956PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover certain Home Owners’ Loan Corporation bonds of the face value of $1100, claiming the same as surviving joint tenant.

The case was tried upon .an agreed statement from which the following facts appear: Mrs. Addie M. Erickson owned a note and mortgage, the title to which she caused to be transferred to herself and the plaintiff as joint tenants on May 7, 1931. She had theretofore caused a bank account to be opened as a joint account between herself and the plaintiff, with the right of survivorship. All funds placed in this account and all withdrawals…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Young v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. In Re Estate of PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Propst v. StillmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API