Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Putnam

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13835PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The contest here is between the daughter of decedent’s predeceased husband and the surviving husband and other heirs of deceased. It centers around the question of whether section 229 of the Probate Code, which provides: “If the decedent leaves no issue, and the estate or any portion thereof was separate prop.erty of a previously deceased spouse, and came to the decedent from such spouse by gift, descent, devise or bequest, such property goes in equal shares to the children of the deceased spouse and to their descendants by representation ...” controls the distribution of a part of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. In Re Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. McKay v. LauristonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In Re the Estate of McArthorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Estate of RattrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API