Badrow v. Common Council of Tonawanda
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
Respondents, in rearguing the motion to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency because petitioners have not been suspended without pay for a period exceeding 10 days, cite Matter of Winn v. Department of Hospitals of City of N. Y., decided by the First Judicial Department (April 2,1964, N. Y. L. J., April 3, 1964, p. 12, col. 2, 20 A D 2d 856) and first reported six days before this court’s decision, denying said motion.
The Winn case denies judicial authority to review such matters, but buttresses its decision by considering the merits.
The doctrine of stare decisis compels Special Term…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamlin v. BenderNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Biley-Stoker Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Hamlin v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Maass v. RosenthalNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- Maass v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hayward v. Willard Mountain, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- Reisig v. KirbyNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Badrow v. Common CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966