Legal Opinion
United States Gypsum Co. v. Biley-Stoker Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalaho, J.
The defendant moves for an order striking ont of the complaint, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the following matters as ‘ ‘ frivolous, irrelevant and redundant,” from paragraph 18, “ and that the said Thomas G-. Steele is entitled to the recovery herein or a portion thereof over and above the amounts for compensation, hospital and medical expenses heretofore or hereafter paid by the plaintiff,” and from paragraph 19, “ the said Thomas G. Steele was damaged ”.
The complaint alleges, in effect, a cause of action under section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law based upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Skakandy v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hamlin v. BenderNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. E. T. Clark Carting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Hamlin v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D'Alessandro v. CarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Ross Bicycles, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Douglas v. LatonaNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. Blount, New York County Courts1975
- Badrow v. Common Council of TonawandaNew York Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.