Legal Opinion
Hamlin v. Bender
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
We think no useful purpose will be served by a further discussion here of the questions so fully considered in the opinion below (92 Misc. Rep. 16). The authorities are in conflict and the questions can only be settled by the court of last resort. We agree with the conclusions reached by the trial court and do not concur in the views which prevailed in People v. Hemleb (127 App. Div. 366). All concurred; De Angelis, J., not sitting. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamlin v. BenderNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Waldstreicher v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Rochester v. Premises Located at 10-12 South Washington StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- People ex rel. Bender v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Biley-Stoker Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Badrow v. Common Council of TonawandaNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- In re the Estate of BonesteelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.