Hayward v. Willard Mountain, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.
Plaintiffs Hayward and Buckley and defendant Charles Millar & Son Co. move for an order granting them a discovery and inspection in the following respects:
1. Requiring defendants Willard Mountain, Inc., and Victor E. Hall, doing business as Hall Engineering Company, to describe and admit each stud, cross arm, piece of steel, machinery, apparatus or equipment tested;
2. Requiring said defendants to deliver to the attorneys for movants for inspection, each stud, cross arm, piece of steel, machinery, apparatus or equipment tested, in the same condition as it was immediately after the happening of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De Vito v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Montgomery Ward Co. v. City of LockportNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Baczmaga v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Badrow v. Common Council of TonawandaNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Reese v. RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edwardes v. Southampton Hospital Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. FMC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Brunswick Corp. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Jansen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1967
- Pinn v. Supermarkets General Corp.Nassau County District Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.