Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Bender

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action for an injunction to restrain the defendant from operating a moving picture theatre' on Sundays.

1Opinion of the CourtEmerson, J.

The defendant is engaged in conducting a moving picture theatre at No. 325 Bleecker street in the city of Utica. The auditorium where the exhibition is held is located on the north side of the street and is back about eighty feet from the sidewalk, the approach being through an alley about twenty feet in width. The seats in the auditorium face to the north and the pictures are reflected upon a screen on the northerly side by means of a cinematograph projector located in the southerly end of the room and operated by a paid employee of the defendant. In connection with the exhibition music is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. . the New-York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. People v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Cranford v. . Tyrrell.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. McKeon v. . SeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. Premises Located at 10-12 South Washington StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People ex rel. Bender v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. People v. WatermanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. Biley-Stoker Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API