Legal Opinion

Latta v. Da Roza

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1929No. Docket No. 3694PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for a balance due on a written contract “to lay 12 inch pipe on the property of Edw. L. da Roza at 45 cents per foot ...” There is a conflict of evidence regarding the number of feet of pipe which was actually laid. It is contended the evidence does not support the judgment against the defendant Roma V. da Roza. The chief controversy, however, is concerning the admission of testimony affecting an alleged trade custom respecting the construction of the term “to lay,” which is employed in the contract.

The written contract was silent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Winterburn v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Weisshand v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Browning v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Continental Bank & Trust Company v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Robertson v. DodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Watson Land Co. v. Rio Grande Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API