Legal Opinion
L.J. Dreiling Motor Co. v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 8, 1985No. Civ. A. 81-C-911PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
This action was commenced by the L.J. Dreiling Motor Company, Inc. (“Dreiling”) against the Peugeot Corporate Family (“Peugeot”) 1 and Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) for damages allegedly resulting from Dreiling’s termination as a Peugeot franchisee. The original complaint, filed June 5, 1981, has gone through several transformations. The Fourth Verified Amended Complaint (hereafter “Complaint”), filed February 17,1983, is currently at issue. In this Complaint, the plaintiff asserts four claims for relief: 1) contracts, combinations or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. MontoyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- David K. Richards v. Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund, Inc., H. Ray Christman and Platte Valley BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Southland Corp. v. BukhariDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.