Legal Opinion

Southland Corp. v. Bukhari

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 19, 1990No. Nos. CV 90-1378, CV 90-1464PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

MISHLER, District Judge.

These actions (the “Bukhari ” action) are based on substantially the same franchise and security agreements that form the basis of CV 90-1375 (Mir/Ali franchisees), CV 90-1377 (Nasim franchisee), and CV 90-1379 (Mir/Mir franchisees), and the actions related thereto which were removed from New York State Supreme Court. The court issues a separate memorandum of decision and order in those actions, making findings of fact and conclusions of law. 748 F.Supp. 969. To the extent that the findings of fact and conclusions of law made in that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Maritime Ventures International, Inc. v. Caribbean Trading & Fidelity, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. General Overseas Films, Ltd. v. Robin International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Hatton v. Quad Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Southland Corp. v. MirDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southland Corp. v. MirDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API