Legal Opinion

Stoll v. Selander

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1947No. Civ. 15569PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem

Appeal is taken by defendant Selander only from a judgment rendered following the institution of an action on November 3, 1944, by plaintiff in a derivative capacity as a stockholder of Associated Material Company, Incorporated, against defendant" Selander and the corporation for an accounting and to quiet title to real and personal property alleged to belong to that corporation. Another action was filed on November 6,1944 (No. 15510) [post, p. 294 (183 P.2d 940)] by plaintiff, in which he individually sought and obtained judgment for damages from Selander for fraud alleged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
  4. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Gottesfeld v. Richmaid Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API