Oregon Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
Petitioners challenge the validity of OAR 811-015-0036, a rule adopted by the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (the board) that authorizes chiropractic physicians to perform “dry needling.” Petitioners assert that the rule exceeds the board’s statutory authority, and they make several arguments to support that contention. We address only petitioners’ first argument — that the challenged rule authorizes a technique that is not encompassed within the practice of “chiropractic,” as defined by ORS 684.010(2)— which is dispositive. Because we conclude that dry needling does not fall within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Wolf v. Oregon Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- BP West Coast Products, LLP v. Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Ciecko v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Barrett v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.