Wolf v. Oregon Lottery Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Under Oregon law, any person dissatisfied with an administrative rule promulgated by an Oregon administrative agency may challenge the validity of that rule in an original proceeding filed in the Court of Appeals. ORS 183.400. This is such a case. The Oregon Lottery Commission (the Lottery), after notice and a series of hearings, promulgated a rule, former OAR 177-040-0026 (2004), dealing with the payments that the Lottery would make to businesses (called “retailers”) that make video lottery games available to the public. Among other things, the rule provided that “[t]he compensation amount…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Wolf v. Oregon Lottery CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3Cited by26 opinions
- Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Oregon Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Sarepta Therapeutics v. Oregon Health AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Indus. Customers of Northwest Util. v. PucCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.