Smith v. Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
Petitioner challenges the validity of a rule adopted by the Department of Corrections (DOC), OAR 291-124-0016(2), requiring the clinical director of DOC’s Health Services to appoint the chief medical officer for each DOC institution. Petitioner also challenges the validity of DOC’s “Health Policy and Procedure #P-A-02.1” (health policy), which purports to explain levels of health care services provided to inmates, as defined in OAR 291-124-0041. According to petitioner, the rule is invalid because it exceeds DOC’s statutory authority, and the health policy is invalid because it constitutes a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Powers v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Brown v. Parks & Recreation Dep'tCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Smith v. Dep't of Corr.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019