Legal Opinion

Smith v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 2016No. A155103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Petitioner challenges the validity of a rule adopted by the Department of Corrections (DOC), OAR 291-124-0016(2), requiring the clinical director of DOC’s Health Services to appoint the chief medical officer for each DOC institution. Petitioner also challenges the validity of DOC’s “Health Policy and Procedure #P-A-02.1” (health policy), which purports to explain levels of health care services provided to inmates, as defined in OAR 291-124-0041. According to petitioner, the rule is invalid because it exceeds DOC’s statutory authority, and the health policy is invalid because it constitutes a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Powers v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Brown v. Parks & Recreation Dep'tCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Smith v. Dep't of Corr.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API