Ciecko v. Dep't of Land Conservation & Dev.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
*1123*657Petitioners bring a direct challenge to the validity of a rule adopted by the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), OAR 660-036-0005, which amends Part Five of the 1994 Territorial Sea Plan (TSP) after recommendations by the Ocean Policy Advisory Council (OPAC). Petitioners contend that the Land Conservation and Development Commission (the commission) failed to comply with the applicable rulemaking procedures set out in ORS 196.471 when it adopted modified amendments to OAR 660-036-0005.1 We agree, and accordingly, hold the amendments to OAR 660-036-0005, effective…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Oregon Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Smith v. Two Rivers Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. States Petroleum Ass'n v. Envtl. Quality Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- N.W. Natural Gas Co. v. Environ. Quality Comm.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023