Legal Opinion
Kemp v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1928No. 21216. Department TwoPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to restrain the defendant city, acting through its city council, from vacating a portion of a certain street. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment dismissing the action, from which the plaintiff appeals.
The facts are these: The plat of the Pontius Second Addition to the city of Seattle was filed for record March 1, 1882. Through this plat from east to west, one of the streets is Bast John street. The plat of Crawford’s Addition to the city of Seattle was filed for record March 29, 1882. On the west side of this plat was a street…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Freeman v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Fry v. O'LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Mottman v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. WinebergWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Royal Transit, Inc. v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Burrow v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Davidson v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.