Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered December 12, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before' the court without a jury, restraining the vacation of a street.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
On October 25, 1889, one A. M. Simpson and the Northwestern Lumber Company, a corporation, platted certain lands in Hoquiam, now a city of the third class, and thereby dedicated H, Fifth and Sixth streets to the use of the public. Said plat shows all of block 37 and one-half of block 36 fronting on H street, to be subdivided as follows:
Each lot on H street shown on the above diagram has a frontage of fifty feet, except lot 5 in block 37, which has a frontage of one hundred feet. Long prior to the vacation hereinafter mentioned, respondents Adolph Ponischill and Mary Ponischil, his wife,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Stanwood v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Glasgow v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Kentucky Club v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Warren v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. WinebergWashington Supreme Court · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.