Legal Opinion

Mottman v. City of Olympia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1907No. 6608PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Linn, J., entered October 30, 1906, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to restrain the vacation of a street.

1Per curiam

The complaint shows, that the appellants are the owners of the south half of lots 7 and 8, in block 25, of the city of Olympia, Washington; that the said real property was and is improved by a two-story brick building thereon, of the value of about $15,000, which has for several years been used for a retail store, and is now being used for a postoffice, telephone office, and for business of various kinds; that the same is now rented and is producing a monthly income of $175, and is situated near the main retail business district of the city and derives a large element of its value from its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. WinebergWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Freeman v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kemp v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Paget v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API