Legal Opinion

Fry v. O'Leary

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1927No. 19880. En BancPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Askreít, J.

This is an action to set aside an- ordinance vacating a portion of a street in Olympia, and to require the removal of a building placed thereon. From an order sustaining a demurrer and dismissing the action, plaintiffs appeal.

In August, 1922, respondents 0 ’Leary, after receiving permission from the city of Olympia, erected a garage and fence within the limits of Garfield avenue in Olympia.

In December, 1925, respondents O’Leary, together with P. M. Troy and James E. Clark, petitioned the city council to vacate thirteen feet off the south side of Garfield avenue between Sherman…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Freeman v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kemp v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. London v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API