Legal Opinion
Neaman v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1992No. B057055PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Jerome Neaman, Avery Neaman and Blythe Leiderman (the Neamans) appeal from the judgment entered in favor of defendants and respondents Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (Kaiser), following the trial court’s denial of the Neamans’ motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award.
Because the neutral arbitrator failed to disclose a substantial business relationship with Kaiser, the judgment will be reversed and the matter remanded to the trial court for vacation of the arbitrator’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Johnston v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gonzales v. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Michael v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Ceriale v. Amco InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Kaiser Found. Hospitals, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Cellular Radio Corp. v. OKI America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.