Legal Opinion
Ceriale v. Amco Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1996No. B095412PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Arbitration No. 1 is a binding arbitration. While it is pending, one of the attorneys involved in arbitration No. 1 becomes an arbitrator in arbitration No. 2, a judicial arbitration. Must the arbitrator in arbitration No. 1 disclose that she represents a party in arbitration No. 2? Yes.
AMCO Insurance Company (AMCO) appeals from the order of the trial court denying its motion to correct or vacate the arbitrator’s award of $278,168.52 for injuries sustained by respondent, Billie Allayne Ceriale (Ceriale), in an automobile accident with an uninsured motorist. Because a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS, INC. v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Michael v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. KorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Roitz v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.